Yesterday I participated in a Twitter chat on using your blog for lead generation, and asked one of the hosts (@amyafrica) if she engaged prospects through social networks in addition to her blog & e-mails.
Her response was interesting: “No. I suck at all things social and when I say suck. I mean I am the world’s worst. I like controlled ROI.”
I found it interesting for 3 reasons:
So, I started thinking about the term “Controlled ROI” & and why someone would want to control it. If you know you’re getting a positive ROI, wouldn’t it be ok to allow return to grow uncontrolled?
The more I thought about it, the more I thought Amy might be thinking in a different way than me; and might be very right. I generally work for large brands who have a ROI target.

If we can spread the message through additional channels without incurring substantially higher costs, the client is usually on board.

Essentially, we would agree on a target (i.e. 5000 new subscriptions, 2% increase in traffic, 5% increase in sales over 6 months) and as long as we hit the target, anything above would be considered icing on the cake.
Then I started thinking about the differences in B2B and B2C marketing, business models, and business goals.
It occurred to me that ROI should be controlled for a few reasons:
So here’s my definition of controlling ROI:
Having the ability to throttle the cost of marketing activities to produce desired revenue.
